No Conclusion Provided
Plain Language Summary
Moderators of nutrition education programs
When developing nutrition education programs, it may be important to think about the factors that act as moderators. Moderators can affect the strength of the impact of a nutrition education program on what children eat. In nutrition education, common moderators include: gender, age, race and/or ethnicity, or body weight. This summary of a NEL evidence scan presents what we know from research about the moderators of nutrition education programs.
What the Research Says
- Thirty studies were included in this review.
- We are unable to compare the results across studies because the studies tested different factors and measured different outcomes.
More research is needed to understand what factors moderate the effects of nutrition education programs.
In designing nutrition education programs, it may be important to consider whether there are certain variables that could act as moderators, impacting the strength of the relationship between nutrition education interventions and children’s dietary intake. The objective of this systematic evidence scan was to examine factors that moderate the effects of nutrition education interventions on children’s and adolescents’ dietary-intake related behavior.
Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, EBSCOhost, Education Fulltext, and Global Health to identify studies that conducted moderator analyses related to nutrition education interventions.
- Inclusion criteria: published between January 1995 and December 2010; conducted in subjects aged 0–18 years; randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, or quasi-experimental studies; subjects from countries with high or very high human development (based on the Human Development Index); subjects who were healthy or at elevated chronic disease risk; published in English in a peer-reviewed journal.
- Exclusion criteria: systematic reviews, meta-analyses, narrative reviews, or prospective cohort, cross-sectional, or case-control designs; studies with no control group; subjects hospitalized, diagnosed with disease, and/or receiving medical treatment.
The results of each included study were summarized in evidence worksheets (including a study quality rating), an evidence paragraph, and evidence table. A group of subject matter experts were involved in a review of the body of evidence and development of research recommendations. Due to the limited and disparate nature of the literature identified, conclusions were not drawn.
- Thirty studies were included in this systematic evidence scan; twenty-one randomized controlled trials and nine non-randomized controlled trials. Eighteen studies received a neutral quality rating (12 RCTs, 6 non-RCTs) and 12 studies received a positive quality rating (9 RCTs, 3 non-RCTs).
- The studies included in this systematic evidence scan examined a wide range of variables as potential moderators. Because each study differed in terms of the variables tested and the outcomes measured, it is difficult to compare results across studies.
This systematic evidence scan was conducted to examine factors that moderate the effects of nutrition education interventions on children’s and adolescents’ dietary-intake related behavior. The studies identified and reviewed examined a wide range of variables as potential moderators. However, because each study differed in terms of the variables tested and the outcomes measured, it is difficult to compare results across studies. Therefore, a full systematic review was not conducted, and instead, a systematic evidence scan was completed. This systematic evidence scan provides an overview of existing research that addresses this topic area, and offers a series of research and systematic review recommendations for the future.